mm-news-@dmin Donald Trump insists he deserves the prize for resolving ‘eight conflicts’, a claim which experts doubt
The Norwegian Nobel Committee in Oslo will bring the suspense to an end when it announces the winner on Friday at 11:00 am (0900 GMT).
The backdrop is bleak: the number of armed conflicts worldwide involving at least one state has never been as high as in 2024, since Sweden’s Uppsala University started its global conflict database in 1946.
Trump has repeatedly said he deserves the prestigious prize for resolving “eight conflicts”, but experts predict he will not be the committee’s choice — at least not this year.
“No, it will not be Trump this year,” Swedish professor Peter Wallensteen, an expert on international affairs, told AFP.
“But perhaps next year? By then, the dust will have settled around his various initiatives, including the Gaza crisis,” he added.
Numerous experts say Trump exaggerates his “peacemaker” claims and warn that his “America First” policies could have serious consequences.
Donald Trump insists he deserves the prize for resolving ‘eight conflicts’, a claim which experts doubt.
Nina Graeger, head of the Peace Research Institute of Oslo, said that beyond trying to broker peace for Gaza, Trump has pursued policies that contradict Alfred Nobel’s intentions, including promoting international cooperation, the fraternity of nations, and disarmament.
For Graeger, the list of Trump’s actions not aligned with the ideals of the Nobel Peace Prize is long.
Trump has withdrawn the US from international organisations and multilateral treaties, launched trade wars against allies and enemies alike, threatened to take Greenland from Denmark by force, ordered the National Guard into US cities, and attacked universities’ academic freedoms as well as freedom of expression.
“We take the complete picture into account,” explained Jorgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the five-member committee awarding the peace prize.
“The whole organisation or the complete personality of that person matters, but what we first and foremost look at is what they have been actually achieving for the sake of peace,” he said.
Uncontroversial pick?
This year, 338 individuals and organisations have been nominated for the peace prize, with the list kept secret for 50 years.
Tens of thousands of people are eligible to propose candidates, including lawmakers and cabinet members of all countries, former laureates, certain university professors, and Nobel committee members.
The committee’s chair said its five members would take everything into account when awarding the prize
In 2024, the award went to Japan’s atomic bomb survivors’ group Nihon Hidankyo for its efforts to ban nuclear weapons.
With no clear favourite this year, several names have been doing the rounds in Oslo ahead of Friday’s announcement.
The Nobel committee mentioned Sudan’s Emergency Response Rooms. A network of volunteers risking their lives to feed and assist people enduring war and famine. As well as Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny. And the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights election watchdog.
The Nobel committee’s choices in recent years have demonstrated “a return to more micro things, somewhat closer to classical ideas of peace”, with a focus on “human rights, democracy, freedom of the press and women”, said Halvard Leira, the director of the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs.
Japan’s atomic bomb survivors’ group Nihon Hidankyo won the 2024 award for its efforts to ban nuclear weapons
“My hunch would probably just perhaps be for a not that controversial candidate this year,” he said.
The Nobel committee could also choose to reaffirm its commitment to a world order currently being challenged. By Trump, by giving the prize to the United Nations Secretary General, Antonio Guterres. Or a UN body like its refugee agency, UNHCR, or the Palestinian relief agency, UNRWA.
It could also give the nod to international tribunals such as the International Court of Justice. Or the International Criminal Court, or champion press freedoms currently under attack. By giving it to the Committee to Protect Journalists or Reporters Without Borders.
But the committee could also do as it has done many times before and pick a completely unexpected winner.
